The U.S. Indictment of Peter Weinzierl and the Dark Legacy of Meinl Bank
Extradition Confirmed: Weinzierl to Face U.S. Justice
On May 8, 2025, former Meinl Bank CEO Peter Weinzierl is scheduled to be extradited from London to the United States to face charges of conspiring to launder over $170 million in connection with the massive Odebrecht bribery scandal. The extradition follows a final ruling by the UK High Court, which rejected Weinzierl’s appeal that U.S. prison conditions would violate his human rights. Even the European Court of Human Rights refused to block the transfer.
Read our report on the extradition of Peter Weinzierl here.
The U.S. indictment, filed in the Eastern District of New York, accuses Weinzierl and fellow Austrian banker Alexander Waldstein of helping Odebrecht move vast sums of illicit funds through Austrian and Caribbean banking networks, using sham contracts, fictitious financial guarantees, and a network of offshore shell companies.
Meinl Bank’s Hidden Role in Global Corruption



Once a fixture of Austria’s financial aristocracy, Meinl Bank AG—founded by the Meinl dynasty and chaired by Julius Meinl V—was a boutique institution catering to wealthy clients and offshore interests. But beneath its polished surface, the bank allegedly operated as a professional laundromat.
Read more about the Odebrecht scandal here on Bloomberg.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Meinl Bank and its subsidiary Meinl Bank Antigua (later sold to Odebrecht agents) were essential to the creation of slush funds used to pay bribes to foreign officials in Panama, Mexico, and Brazil, and to hide Odebrecht’s tax liabilities from the Brazilian government.
The schemes involved fake guarantee agreements and back-to-back transactions that gave the illusion of legitimate business expenses while actually facilitating criminal money laundering and bribery. Meinl Bank charged generous fees—up to 4.5% per transaction—and earned millions for its role.
Legal Blow in London: Human Rights Argument Rejected
Weinzierl’s defense rested on Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, arguing that U.S. prison conditions were “inhumane.” But in a precedent-setting judgment, the UK High Court ruled that adequate diplomatic assurances were provided and that extradition was lawful—even though Weinzierl is an Austrian citizen.
The legal firm Devonshires, which analyzed the case, concluded that the ruling “confirms the strength of U.S.-UK extradition cooperation” and that white-collar defendants cannot hide behind human rights clauses when facing serious financial crime charges.
Timeline: The Meinl Bank Antigua Sale
- Before 2010: Meinl Bank Antigua was fully owned and controlled by Meinl Bank AG, under the leadership of Julius Meinl.
- Late 2010: 51% of Meinl Bank Antigua was sold to Odebrecht’s bribery division (DSO) for roughly $4 million.
- Post-sale: Meinl Bank AG retained correspondent banking access for Antigua, allowing continued use of its infrastructure to launder funds.
This sale, described by the DOJ as “knowingly facilitated,” became a gateway into the global banking system for Odebrecht’s corrupt operations.
Comparison Table: Meinl’s Claims vs. DOJ Allegations
Claim by Julius Meinl (Source: House of Julius Meinl) | U.S. DOJ Allegation |
---|---|
“All activities of Meinl Bank AG were subject to Austrian oversight. No wrongdoing was found.” | DOJ says Meinl Bank AG knowingly laundered funds and participated in sham transactions. |
“Meinl Bank Antigua was sold in 2010. We had no influence afterward.” | DOJ claims Meinl Bank AG retained correspondent access and was complicit in post-sale laundering. |
“No AML failures or criminal findings by Austrian authorities.” | DOJ accuses Meinl Bank of having no AML/KYC controls and acting as a central financial hub for bribes. |
“The bank was renamed Anglo Austrian AAB as part of a broader strategy.” | Regulators see the name change as rebranding to escape reputational collapse. License was revoked in 2020. |
“Peter Weinzierl acted independently.” | DOJ says Weinzierl and Waldstein coordinated with Odebrecht agents to launder money globally. |
Julius Meinl in His Own Words
“All activities of Meinl Bank AG were thoroughly investigated by the Austrian authorities. These investigations led to the conclusion that no wrongdoing had occurred.”
“It is crucial to note that Meinl Bank Antigua, which later became involved in problematic transactions, was sold in 2010. After that, Meinl Bank AG had neither influence nor operational control.”
“We regret the damage that the name Meinl has suffered, but reject any allegations of wrongdoing in the strongest terms.”
—Julius Meinl V, via House of Julius Meinl
Austria: Complicit or Complacent?
The Austrian judiciary has quietly dropped all charges against Julius Meinl, Peter Weinzierl, and Meinl Bank AG—despite the depth of U.S. evidence. While the U.S. indictment lays out a global criminal conspiracy, Austria’s legal system remains notably silent. The Financial Market Authority (FMA) did revoke the bank’s license—but without any criminal consequences for the architects of the system.
The contrast is stark: while the United States builds indictments, Austria buries them.
Call for Information
If you have insights into the operations of Meinl Bank, Odebrecht-linked payments, or the Austrian banking system, submit them anonymously via Whistle42.com.
Earn rewards in TCO (TarCasso Coins) and help expose corruption in high finance.
Sources & References
- U.S. DOJ Indictment (EDNY Case No. 1:20-cr-00383-RJD)
- Bloomberg: “No One Has Ever Built a Corruption Machine Like This One”
- Reuters: Austrian Banker Loses Fight Against Extradition
- Devonshires Legal Briefing on Extradition Case
- House of Julius Meinl – Official Banking Statement