Friday, July 4, 2025

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

DOJ’s FCPA Reset: 50 % of Bribery Cases Axed as “America-First” Doctrine Rewrites Global Compliance Map

Spread financial intelligence

The U.S. Justice Department has quietly closed about half of its open Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) probes and released new guidelines that tie future anti-bribery prosecutions to clear U.S. national-security or competitiveness harms. The move, coupled with fresh whistle-blower incentives and a sharper focus on individual culpability, redraws the risk landscape for multinationals—especially in cyber-finance hubs.


KEY POINTS

  1. 50 % of active FCPA investigations terminated; only “strategic” cases remain.
  2. New June 9 Guidelines require prosecutors to prove material harm to U.S. interests and obtain senior sign-off before opening a file.
  3. Individual accountability is now paramount, reinforced by an expanded Corporate Whistle-blower Awards Pilot Program.
  4. Companies that self-disclose, cooperate, and remediate can avoid charges; monitorships will be used sparingly.
  5. Digital-asset bribery flagged as an emerging threat—DOJ’s April memo narrows its crypto focus to bad actors, not platforms.

SHORT NARRATIVE

On June 9-10, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche unveiled the Guidelines for Investigations and Enforcement of the FCPA, ending a 180-day enforcement pause ordered by President Trump. Roughly half of all pending corporate-bribery matters—including headline probes into aerospace and medical-device giants—were dismissed. Prosecutors must now show that alleged bribery undermines U.S. national security, distorts competition for American firms, aids cartels/TCOs, or involves serious, concealment-rich misconduct before proceeding. The policy dovetails with DOJ’s separate digital-asset directive, which targets individuals using crypto for illicit finance rather than compliant platforms.


EXTENDED ANALYSIS

DimensionImplications
LegalThe national-interest test effectively narrows FCPA’s extraterritorial reach; expect jurisdictional challenges from defense counsel and a likely uptick in Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests as DOJ defers “non-strategic” cases to local authorities. (Source: wilmerhale.com)
RegulatorySEC civil FCPA enforcement remains untouched, creating a two-track system where companies may still face SEC exposure even when DOJ steps back. Parallel regimes (UK Bribery Act, Sapin II) will fill gaps, increasing cross-border coordination pressure.
OperationalCompliance teams must map bribery risks to four DOJ factors (cartels/TCOs, U.S. competitiveness, national security, gravity of misconduct). Third-party and high-risk-market onboarding processes need recalibration—in particular where payments flow through digital assets or AI-enabled supply-chain platforms. (Source: hunton.com)
Whistle-blowers & IndividualsThe expanded pilot program promises monetary rewards for original tips leading to > $1 m forfeitures, amplifying insider threat vectors and necessitating stronger internal reporting channels. (Source: reuters.com)
Cyber-Finance IntersectionWhile the FCPA normally targets “anything of value,” the DOJ’s crypto memorandum signals that token-based inducements may fall under FCPA if used to bribe foreign officials tied to TCOs or sanctioned entities. Firms in DeFi, payment orchestration, and cross-border remittance should expect joint FCPA–money-laundering sweeps. (Source: hunton.com)

CALL FOR INFORMATION

Have intel on bribery schemes involving crypto wallets, AI-powered procurement, or offshore payment gateways? Share your information via our whistleblower system, Whistle42.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles